HeadOn: A Lesson in Marketing Brilliance
Oh, you've seen it, too?
It's been six months since the most cryptically obnoxious commercial in recent memory first aired. The ad for HeadOn seemed so functionally retarded as to be immune to ridicule, and by now it's revered as a pop culture phenomenon for its "what the hell was that?" quality.
But this was all a front, you see. Have you noticed new versions of the spot? Where a struggling actor/actress steps into the frame to emote about how obnoxious the ad is? At the end, they tack on a grudging testimonial about the stick's apparent effectiveness in spite of its "annoying" promotion: "But your product is amazing!" says the bald black man, gnashing his teeth and clenching the stick in what can only be described as homicidal appreciation. The blonde woman in the other version also seems dangerously undermedicated in her praise.
But there's some genius in this whole promotion.
1. The original ad was just a straw man. We're supposed to rally around the call of those onscreen "critics" who apparently share our distaste for the commercial, and this makes their claims of the product's effectiveness seem all the more objective and credible, therefore.
The only drawback is that they're too crazy. The ad campaign just squandered a perfect setup by making these people seem too wronged by the commercial. It's as if every time they're exposed to the ad, you'd later find them sprawled on the floor of their shower for an hour and a half with the water barely running ("Not getting clean... not getting clean..."). I don't know about you, but even after six months of watching this commercial, I was never quite there.
This is really the only mishandling of an otherwise fiendishly clever advertising scheme, and it does have additional strengths.
2. The commercial induces the very ailment that it is widely assumed to cure. Can you imagine how much more profitable Viagra would be if its nationally televised commercials were to somehow feature 80-year-old women in the nude? I believe men of all ages would be struck impotent and in immediate want of the little blue pills for hours afterward. This is no different.
3. Also notice that the ad and its Web site never specified what malady HeadOn is supposed to assuage. Headaches? A conjecture bearing some merit, yes, but what if it doesn't "cure" headaches? You have no reason to complain; perhaps that's simply not HeadOn's purpose, and you're just misinterpreting a highly complicated commercial. I've brainstormed some other possibilities for HeadOn's intended effect:
a. A spiritual balm to open up The Third Eye, allowing HeadOn's purchaser to mentally punch through the dimensional fabric and peer into the future. Just look at that woman's eyes.
b. wrinkle-busting Botox chapstick.
c. LSD, which takes an express lane from the skin to the brain.
d. A glue stick. After rubbing in its adhesive, the consumer then writes the word "Tool" on a sheet of paper and then applies the sheet directly to the forehead.
I really do think this is the Snakes on a Plane of pseudo-medical products. Now, I don't know anyone who's admittedly bought a stick of HeadOn, but judging by the ad campaign's staying power, something must be working. Still, the ad's oft-repeated line shouldn't be reverberating in our brains for much longer. Which will be nice, because for a few minutes following each commercial break during Jeopardy, it's been a bitch to concentrate.
Labels: failed actors, marketing, TV commercials



